[Buddha-l] Was Buddha a Buddhist

[J Tatelman]

Jim,

Very good points! But what have you in mind when you write that the 
Buddha was radical "even in the context of the sramana movement"? What 
about Mahavira, for example?

Joel.

On May 23, 2006, at 12:37 AM, Blumenthal, James wrote:

> I think the question of the Buddha being Buddhist is entirely 
> different from the question of Jesus being Christian.  Jesus was a 
> Jew.  In fact, he was a Rabbi.  He never left the faith.  He never 
> spoke of starting  a new religion.  Certainly he was critical of 
> certain elements of the Jewish power elite, but that does not mean he 
> was intending to start a new religion.  Christianity and the theology 
> of a messiah dying for the sins of humanity was a creation of the 
> early community of Jesus' followers in the first century after his 
> death.
>
>  As for the Buddha being a Buddhist, I think the question is sort of 
> irrelavent from a Buddhist perspective. We can't really make the 
> determination based on refuge, because once one is a Buddha, there is 
> no need for refuge.  Refuge is taken *until* one achieves Buddhahood.  
> Unlike Jesus, the Buddha was introducing a new spiritual path. He was 
> heterodoxical not only in the face of Vedic Brahminism, but even in 
> the context of the sramana movement, his worldview and approach was 
> quite radical.
>  Jim Blumenthal
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1376 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/private/buddha-l/attachments/20060523/b5a5a6f4/attachment-0001.bin