[Buddha-l] Non attached & mindful culinary triumphalism?
Geoff Zinderdine
geoff.zinderdine at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 07:58:02 MDT 2011
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 07:24 , Richard Hayes wrote:
>
> > On Jul 11, 2011, at 23:07, "Dan Lusthaus" <vasubandhu at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> There's a difference between diagnostics and labeling. Issue would be
> >> whether the description is accurate, or ridiculing it is a way of
> blunting
> >> its accuracy.
> >
> > Exactly.
>
> There is, incidentally, no accuracy at all in the label "narcissistic" when
> applied wholesale to people who subscribe to any particular approach to
> meta-ethics. "Narcissist" is a psychological term and is probably best
> applied by a trained analyst after considerable exposure to the analysand to
> whom it is applied. It isn't something to be thrown around lightly, lest it
> be construed as a form of ridicule that has the effect, as Dan puts it so
> well, of blunting accuracy.
Is that necessarily true when ridiculing "lightweights" on an academic
forum? I would think that the accuracy is less important than the sheer
blunt force trauma of the bludgeon. Just to clarify.
Geoff
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list