[Buddha-l] Buddhas Meditation

[Gad Horowitz]

What if being "attached" to vegetarianism meant that you would treat meat 
eaters with contempt, or worse?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "JKirkpatrick" <jkirk at spro.net>
To: "'Buddhist discussion forum'" <buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 7:28 PM
Subject: [Buddha-l] Buddhas Meditation


> Come on, you philosophes--------------kindly explain why this
> phrase makes no sense, or viprysasa-wise, how it does make
> sense(????)
>
> "eating meat with non-attachment is preferable to being attached
> to vegetarianism.."
>
> Precisely what is the point?
> IMO it's humbug.
>
> I ask for comment because this list is ever in the habit of
> ignoring anything I say in response to various posts. Now,
> typically, you are all doing it again--paying attention only to
> what the men among us say.
>
> I'm not any more idiotic than the rest of you. So either be
> inclusive in this discussion, or go to hina hell.
>
> Joanna
>
> _______________________________________________
> buddha-l mailing list
> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
>