[Buddha-l] Paul Williams
SJZiobro at cs.com
SJZiobro at cs.com
Wed Dec 26 11:55:12 MST 2007
Not really. There is also idealism, dualism, etc.
Timothy Smith <smith at wheelwrightassoc.com> wrote:
>So, if the choice of either position is naive realism, then we are
>left with no choice but the Buddha's. Don't ask. Don't tell.
>
>
>Timothy Smith
>Wheelwright Associates
>
>www.wheelwrightassoc.com
>
>
>
>On Dec 24, 2007, at 4:15 PM, SJZiobro at cs.com wrote:
>
>> "[DPD Web] Shen Shi'an" <shian at kmspks.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Causation already answers about the nature of why there is
>>> anything at
>>> all. On the other hand, postulating the existence of an uncaused God
>>> stirs up the classic problems.
>>>
>>> Once again, from
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thedailyenlightenment-realisation/
>>> message/
>>> 221 : (The 3rd para is the crux - a simple "proof" on why there is no
>>> God)
>>>
>>> Why "Intelligent Design" Lacks Intelligence
>>>
>>> Recently, there was much outrage in the academic world when
>>> "intelligent
>>> design" was proposed by some to be scientific. The theory of
>>> "intelligent design" argues that the universe, being so intricately
>>> structured, must surely be the design of a super-intelligent
>>> being. This
>>> belief is creationism, which is based on mere faith. It is the
>>> opposite
>>> of evolution, which is the largely observable fact that life and the
>>> universe evolves over time, adapting to changes of natural
>>> conditions.
>>
>> the statement for a creator or against are not based simply on
>> observation, since one can conclude either from reflection upon
>> what is observed. There is an element of faith in either position,
>> which to deny or overlook places one in the position of naive realism.
>>
>> Stan Ziobro
>> _______________________________________________
>> buddha-l mailing list
>> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
>> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>buddha-l mailing list
>buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
>http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
>
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list