[Buddha-l] Non-dual scholars?

[Bob Zeuschner]

No one has mentioned David Loy's "Nonduality: A Study in Comparative 
Philosophy" (Yale, 1987) where the introductory chapter separates out 
several different kinds of non-duality (subject/object, knower/known, 
atman/brahman, etc.) and then goes on to discuss "nondual perception," 
"nondual action" (Taoism) and "nondual thinking" (prajna).
It might be relevant to the discussion.
Bob Zeuschner
Dept. of Philosophy

Bernie Simon wrote:

> My understanding of the non-dualism issue is that at some point one sees 
> that certain distinctions one has made, such as watcher and watched or 
> subject and object, are merely notional. The collapse of the reification 
> of these notions can be interpreted as the collapse of dualism.