[Buddha-l] it's not about belief -= science & Christian religion
Jim Peavler
jpeavler at mindspring.com
Fri Jan 6 10:56:14 MST 2006
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Richard P. Hayes wrote:
>
> Noam Chomsky has observed that what distinguishes entomology from
> butterfly collecting is not the subject matter, but the methodology
> and
> the overall attitude involved in pursuing the subject matter. So I
> would
> still argue that there was precious little anywhere in the world that
> qualified as science before the 18th century or so. Sure, there were
> astrologers and alchemists, but there were not astronomers or
> chemists.
> There were plenty of people advancing technology, but hardly anyone
> was
> advancing a purely theoretical understanding of the world in which we
> live, without reference to questions of what is worthwhile and what is
> helpful to man human beings more capable of discovering their own
> purpose in the cosmos.
I agree with what you say absolutely. And half of my Ph.D. was on the
history of science. So that makes me an authority. I expect this
"science" part of the "belief" thread to be closed. (I am trying to
avoid being disingenuous.)
>
>
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list