[Buddha-l] Pudgalavada - Vasumitra2b

[Stephen Hodge]

L.S. Cousins wrote:

> Surely, the point is that they are not cittasamprayukta i.e. they don't 
> share the same object, material base, etc. They are not dissociated from 
> citta in the sense of being quite separated.

Lance,

Well, perhaps it depends from what context you are speaking.  As far as I 
know, the Vaibhasika view is that they are quite separate from mind.  But I 
am not sure why you are bringing this up -- the viprayukta / asamprayukta in 
the Vasumitra text doesn't seem to be obviously talking about 
citta-viprayukta-dharmas.  Perhaps I'm missing something.

Best wishes,
Stephen Hodge