[Buddha-l] Re: recommendations for books on Madhyamika
Benito Carral
bcarral at kungzhi.org
Tue Oct 18 20:08:52 MDT 2005
On Tuesday, October 18, 2005, Franz Metcalf wrote:
> I wouldn't say that Curt's and Richard's caricatures
> of Zen practice are "plain nonsense." Stereotypes,
> yes, but not nonsense. I think they are off the mark
> these days at most Zen centers in the West, but I
> think that's because Western Zen has grown much more
> comfortable with its intellectual heritage in these
> last ten years or so. Before that things were pretty
> darn anti-intellectual, at least here in California.
The question is that Californian Zen was not a
faithful to of Zen, at least not to Chinese Zen.
Californian Zen was what Westerners wanted then. They
were entertained trying to be dharma bums, laughing
with Alan Watt's jokes. And they created (supported)
such kind of Zen.
If someone wants to learn something interesting
about Zen, I would suggest to read Daoxin's _The
Fundamental Expedient Teachings for Calming the Mind
Wich Attains Enlightenment,_ where one can read, for
example:
When you are first beginning to practice
sitting meditation, dwell in a quite place and
directly contemplate your body and mind. You
should contemplate the four elements and the
five skandhas, [the six sense organs, viz.] the
eye, ear, nose, tongue, boy and mind, and [the
three poisons of] desire, anger, and delusion,
whether they are good or evil, whether they are
enemies or allies, whether they are profane or
sacred, and so on through all the various items
(fa) [of existence]. From the very beginning
they are non-substantial and tranquil, neither
arising nor disappearing, being equal and
non-dual. From the very beginning they have
never existed, but ultimately are utterly
tranquil. From the very beginning are totally
pure and free.
What some people see as Western innovations in Zen
practice are really something as old as Zen is.
Best wishes,
Beni
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list