[Buddha-l] Re: Deep sleep
Benito Carral
bcarral at kungzhi.org
Tue Nov 8 18:53:58 MST 2005
On Sunday, November 6, 2005, Rahula wrote:
Thank you very much for the references.
> 1. Sleeping, Dreaming an Dying (Dalai Lama etc)
I have this book and have read it some years ago. I
don't remember that it contains a clear discussion of
the deep sleep state, but maybe my memory is not
working well here.
> 2. The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep
I have this book and I'm going to quote the relevant
passages because maybe someone could be interested:
The normal process of sleep occurs as
consciousness withdraws from the senses and the
mind loses itself in distraction, thinning out
in mental images and thoughts until it dissolves
in darkness. Unconsciousness then lasts until
dreams arise. [...]
Sleep is dark because we lose consciousness
in it. It seems to be empty of experience
because we identify with the gross mind, which
ceases to function during sleep. [...]
Although we define sleep as unconsciousness,
the darkness and experiental blankness are not
the essence of sleep. For pure awareness that is
our basis there is no sleep. When not afflicted
with obscurations, dreams, or thoughts, the
moving mind dissolves into the nature of mind;
then, rather than the sleep of ignorance,
clarity, peacefulness, and bliss arise.
Tenzin Wangyal Rimpoche, 1998, p. 143.
This view is in harmony with what Ven. Jing-hui told
me in a personal meeting in 2002 at the abbot's
quarters of Bailin-si (Hebei, China). I wonder if there
are more textual references of this state.
It is also interesting to contrast this view with
the one expressed by Ramesh S. Balsekar (Advaita):
In deep sleep the sentient being himself is not
there. So the Consciousness in deep sleep not
aware of itself, is the original state. Then in
the waking state, the first moment of awakening
is Consciousness becoming aware of itself. And
if there are other sentient beings, then
inter-human relationships arise. But if there
are no other sentient beings, then there is only
Consciousness observing the manifestation, and
there is no sense of '"me." There is merely a
sense of awareness of the manifestation. No "me"
and no "other" exist.
Consciousness Speaks, 1992, p. 77.
Best wishes,
Beni
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list