[Buddha-l] S. Pinker (linguist, cognitive psychologist)

Stanley J. Ziobro II ziobro at wfu.edu
Mon Jun 27 18:49:51 MDT 2005


On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Peter D. Junger wrote:

> "Bruce G. Seidner Ph.D." writes:
>
> : Lots of folks have taken on Chomsky-like idealism. One of my favorites was
> : Herbert Terrace who debunked the claims of "nurturing" an ape to use
> : American Sign Language in the case of Nim Chimpsky.
>
> I am afraid that the Nim Chimpsky project was an effort to prove
> Chomsky wrong.  Chompsly's major linguistic postition, as I understand
> it, is that all human beings have an inherent language faculty that
> is not shared with other species and that is the same in all human
> beings.
>
> Nor would Chomsky be happy with having his position referred to as
> idealism.  He claims that he is a dualist and traces his intellectual
> ancestors to Descartes and  the school of Port Royale.  Or at least
> he once claimed that and I am quite sure that he is no more capable
> of admitting that he was wrong than is the President of the United
> States.  But then he---like most people---is much less likely to be
> wrong than is the president of the United States.

Yes, an less likely to be wrong than Bill Clinton was in so much of his
presidency.

Stan Ziobro


More information about the buddha-l mailing list