[Buddha-l] consciousness
StormyTet at aol.com
StormyTet at aol.com
Tue Jul 5 08:30:09 MDT 2005
Hi Hal,
Hal> Consciousness is one of the 5 heaps or Skandhas. Also the 12 Links of
Causation is worth looking into. Somtimes there is a likening to milk in
water when many students study together for 108 days before taking monastic
precepts. IMHO The Internet is about the worst place to look for it;
although, Buddha-L is probably one of the best places to find an inkling.
Meditating with real folks and reciting mantras with real flesh and blood
sentient beings will trump the Internet very easily.
stormy: Thank you for the direction. I don't understand the milk in water
analogy? Though I do not doubt that meditating with real people and being
involved in a grounded tradition is the most healthy and sane path, the truth is
that people are having all kinds of experiences brought on by the focus,
sensory deprivation, immersion, and jolting encounters with disembodied sentient
beings in this virtual world. For good or ill, it is happening.
Hal:One big limiting factor, or problem that can arise is the Ego. People
who
just talk about their own consciousness and shut off their ears while other
people contribute will not be very successful at consciousness integration.
Stormy: It is this integration issue that is key to my study. It is rare to
see any manifestations on the internet of integration, but some of the
theories born out of this medium seem to me to have an eastern wisdom. When I ask
and look, I am finding that many of these people are dedicated meditators and
social progressives.
Hal: What is not consciousness integration? When two ships pass in the
night, is
there consciousness integration? Perhaps the whole concept of a
consciousness needs to be investigated... Is it real? What is it made of?
Inside? Outside? etc..
Stormy: Between reading Techgnosis and Rational Mysticism and various papers
on the evolution of language and communication, my brain is fried on the
concept of consciousness. I don't know what it is. My tendency is to say that it
is, at least in part, Mystery and that this mystery is what ultimately leads
us forward for good or ill. If you can forgive my esoteric fallback on
Mystery, I guess that I would say that the reason that I can talk about an
unintegrated conciousness is that so many people are struggling to 'know' mystery by
avoiding acceptance of it. I also think that at times when the existential
reality of our existence overcomes people through practices like extended
internet immersion that their brain circuitry is not at all prepared for the
reality they experience. I think that I am beginning to develop a definition of
integrated consciousness though -- it is a consciousness that is aware of and
comfortable with subjective, objective and mystery dimensions of reality.
It seems to me that lack of integration comes from either too much ego or an
underedeveloped ego. Any thoughts?
Stormy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/private/buddha-l/attachments/20050705/4acab397/attachment.html
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list