[Buddha-l] more tibetan self-immolations
Jo
jkirk at spro.net
Mon Jan 9 14:08:54 MST 2012
Stefan
I trust that you are not considering suicide bombing as good ol' upaya terrorism?
How about the idea of ninja sabotage? That doesn't imply suicide bombing, but it sure implies a lot of other ways to make life difficult for oppressors.
Joanna
-----Original Message-----
From: buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com [mailto:buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Detrez
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:14 AM
To: Buddhist discussion forum
Subject: Re: [Buddha-l] more tibetan self-immolations
>
>
>
> I must agree, that the only non-violence way is to wait.
>
>
I'm not in support of violence, especially since Tibet doesn't stand a chance against China, but I also think the Chinese have an advantage in the non-violent resistance from the Tibetans, and 'to wait' only means 'wait until Tibetan culture is assimilated into Chinese culture'. The Chinese will also applaud self-immolation, because as such, the problem solves itself. I also think non-violence is not a passe-partout strategy for any social struggle. It might have worked in India, but if the Jews and others in WWII would have been non-violent, the Endlösung would have been much more drastic and with less managerial problems for the Germans. Maybe good ol' upaya-like terrorism can shake the Chinese. There might not be a ground for that in the texts, but it will surely draw attention to the fact that the Tibetans won't just give up their culture.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
buddha-l mailing list
buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list