[Buddha-l] Buddhism and Psychology research
Franz Metcalf
franz at mind2mind.net
Fri Sep 3 20:45:33 MDT 2010
Richard et al.,
Just time for a quick reply then gone for three days. If someone
replies and I do not, please don't take it as a sign of umbrage. I'm
just out of touch.
On Sep 3, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Richard Hayes wrote:
> calling an author an odd duck hardly addresses his arguments or
> the textual evidence he adduces to show that Freud strongly
> suspected his father's sexual improprieties and covered them up.
Quite so. I was making an ad hominem attack. But, you know, sometimes
an ad hominem attack is right on target. Vis. the whole Shimano
matter. And--Buddha help me for saying this in public, but--Freud's
insight that the overwhelming majority of remembered sexual abuse
simply did not happen was absolutely brilliant and was the key to
unlocking the unconscious in all its wonderful deviousness. Without
that revolutionary leap of Freud's mind, hundreds of millions of
people would be significantly more unhappy than they are today. So I
say.
Aong with you, I "very much admire Freud and consider him an
intellectual giant." It may be, as well, that I set his bodhisattva
status higher than you do. Yeah, the whole inner circle secret ring
thing was sad, but let's recall that these men were leaping out the
windows of the house of faith--for most of them "the faith of our
fathers"--and they felt they needed a safety net. As with Marxists,
the rejection of religion entailed a necessary reproduction of
religious certitude and community, but dressed in the garb of science.
For the incalculable service they have done the world, I cut these
pioneers of psychoanalysis a great deal of slack. (I'm not so keen on
the Marxists, though reading the early Marx is definitely a religious
experience. [Talk about reproducing and disguising religious views!])
But as for
>> (who apologizes if this post is a tad fuzzy-headed, as his six year
>> old daughter is home and distracting him greatly as he writes)
>
> That's right, blame it on the woman. How Freudian can you get?
you have totally nailed me. Mea culpa. (And I can, indeed--being the
father of a six year old girl--testify that Freud was onto something
with that ol' Oedipus/Electra thing.)
Still wondering what women (and Buddhas) want,
Franz
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list