[Buddha-l] Enlightenment as dogma

[lemmett at talk21.com]

>"...to be a rigorously valid belief."
> >Beliefs are relative, there is no such thing as a
> 'rigorously
> (or 
> >universally, or anything else) valid' belief because
> rigor, like
> 
> >belief, is always more or less or 'both and'--- just
> like 
> >generalisations.
> >
> >Joanna
> 
> 
> But I should think they could be more or less well grounded
> which
> is perhaps what was meant.
> 
> Randall 
> _________________
> Yes, but it did not seem to me that this was what Luke
> meant.
> 
> Joanna 

No sorry, it is what I meant 
"Valid 2a : well-grounded or justifiable : being at once relevant and meaningful <a valid theory>"
Thanks,
Luke