[Buddha-l] Enlightenment as dogma

[Randall Jones]

>"...to be a rigorously valid belief."
>Beliefs are relative, there is no such thing as a 'rigorously (or
>universally, or anything else) valid' belief because rigor, like
>belief, is always more or less or 'both and'--- just like
>generalisations.
>
>Joanna


But I should think they could be more or less well grounded which is 
perhaps what was meant.

Randall