[Buddha-l] Chinese Canon
Jackhat1 at aol.com
Jackhat1 at aol.com
Wed May 26 12:06:15 MDT 2010
Is the Chinese Canon merely a commentary on the Pali Canon and thus less
authoritative (closer to the Buddha's intention)? Or, did parts of the early
canon got recorded in Chinese before the Pali was sometimes later tampered
with and that is why some of the differences in the Chinese canon can
sometimes be more authoritative,
I really don't want to get into a discussion of what authoritative means.
jack
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list