[Buddha-l] Dharmapala, redux
    JKirkpatrick 
    jkirk at spro.net
       
    Fri Aug  6 16:29:23 MDT 2010
    
    
  
 I may just be pointing at the moon, but sometimes symbols can be
taken in ways completely opposed to the original meaning they
had, particular if they settle in other cultures.  I really don't
know what it would mean to be ONLY symbolic:  would that be to
have no influence in the tradition, to be merely decorative, to
be, maybe, empty?  
Andy
_________________
Andy:
"I really don't know what it would mean to be ONLYsymbolic:
would that be to have no influence in the tradition, to be merely
decorative, to be, maybe, empty? "
Nobody, least of all me, has suggested approaching any reading of
anything as ONLYsymbolic.
Yikes.
Joanna
    
    
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list