[Buddha-l] [Bulk] Re: Dating of the Historical Buddha--a review article byLance Cousins

[Joel Tatelman]

The articles in the volumes edited by Bechert discuss exactly those  
topics, though overall there may be greater interest in the date of  
the parinirvāṇa.

Cheers,

Joel Tatelman.


On 4-Mar-09, at 10:42 PM, Weng-Fai Wong wrote:

> And there is also widespread disagreement about the time of the  
> year of the
> Buddha's birth, enlightenment and parinirvana. Any study on that?
>
> W.F. Wong
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com [mailto:buddha-l-
>> bounces at mailman.swcp.com] On Behalf Of jkirk
>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:31 AM
>> To: 'Buddhist discussion forum'
>> Subject: [Buddha-l] Dating of the Historical Buddha--a review article
>> byLance Cousins
>>
>> http://indology.info/papers/cousins/
>>
>> (A review article of The Dating of the Historical Buddha. Die
>> Datierung des Historischen Buddha.Edited by Heinz Bechert. 2 Vols
>> (of 3). (Symposium zur Buddhismusforschung, IV, 1-2) pp. xv +
>> 525; x + 530. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991-2. DM 310,
>> 256.)
>>
>>
>> Maybe some list members (such as yours truly) haven't come across
>> this article about a much discussed and analysed topic.
>>
>> Joanna
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buddha-l mailing list
>> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
>> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buddha-l mailing list
> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l