[Buddha-l] Question for acedemic teachers of Buddhism
Jackhat1 at aol.com
Jackhat1 at aol.com
Tue Jun 24 10:13:57 MDT 2008
In a message dated 6/23/2008 6:52:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
rhayes at unm.edu writes:
Any time a university course on religion is taught in such a way that it
makes followers of that religious tradition happy, it is not being
taught properly. If people want to feel warm and fuzzy about some
religious tradition, let them go to a church, a synagogue, a mosque or a
temple. Classrooms have no room for such sentimentality.
=====
Do you believe that teachers of courses in religion have an obligation to
make it clear why a person not born into that religion and maybe from a
different culture might find that religion attractive?
By the way, I have been asked to perform that role in several local
comparative religion courses. I visit the class and present my views on Buddhism. If
not asked, I will bring up why I became a Buddhist, how it may have changed
me, how some of its practices might benefit those not interested in changing
their present religion, etc.
Jack
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list