[Buddha-l] FW: H-ASIA: Tibetan language --Tibetan terms for"autonomy" & "independence" --query on usage (jkirk)
jkirk
jkirk at spro.net
Tue Aug 12 13:50:40 MDT 2008
No thanks for an unhelpful reply.
Yes of course they are distinct terms in English. Look them up
J
-----Original Message-----
From: buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com
[mailto:buddha-l-bounces at mailman.swcp.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Essex
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:11 PM
To: buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
Subject: Re: [Buddha-l] FW: H-ASIA: Tibetan language --Tibetan
terms for"autonomy" & "independence" --query on usage (jkirk)
There is a distinction in English? (Other than politics where
autonomous means not-autonomous)
This question raises some interesting, er, questions-- I'd love
to know what the Tibetan language specialists on this list think.
Is it true "that the Tibetan lexicon made no distinction between
the English words for 'autonomy' and 'independence''' ?
Hoping for replies, Joanna K.
_______________________________________________
buddha-l mailing list
buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list