[Buddha-l] FW: H-ASIA: Tibetan language --Tibetan terms for "autonomy" & "independence" --query on usage
jkirk
jkirk at spro.net
Tue Aug 12 09:03:40 MDT 2008
This question raises some interesting, er, questions--
I'd love to know what the Tibetan language specialists on this
list think.
Is it true "that the Tibetan lexicon made no distinction between
the English words for 'autonomy' and 'independence''' ?
Hoping for replies, Joanna K.
==========================================================
H-ASIA
Augsut 12, 2008
Query on Tibetan language usage - "autonomy" and "independence"
*****************************************************************
*******
From: Vincent K Pollard <pollard at hawaii.edu>
Dear Colleagues,
In his article "Official Policies and Covert Programs; The U.S.
State Department and the Tibetan Resistance," _Journal of Cold
War Studies_, vol. 5, no. 3 (Summer 2003), John Kenneth Knaus
refers to "the misgivings of the consulate translator, George
Patterson [in Calcutta, India], who warned [in 1951] that the
Tibetan lexicon made no distinction between the English words for
'autonomy' and 'independence'' (p. 62).
[Based on information supplied earlier in Knaus's article, the
bracketed material in that quotation has been supplied by me.]
In support of the statement quoted above, Knaus cites a letter
written by Patterson to him forty-five years after the event --
on 2 April 1996.
Was Patterson correct?
And is this an accurate summary today? In other words, has
language usage in Tibetan changed in the intervening fifty-seven
years?
Vincent K. Pollard University of Hawai'i - Manoa
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~pollard/Asia.html
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list