databases (was: Re: [Buddha-l] Tibetan for...?)

Jim Peavler jmp at peavler.org
Tue Jan 9 14:52:39 MST 2007


On Jan 8, 2007, at 7:27 PM, jkirk wrote:

> Why would anyone
>> write a message to a list of this nature if they weren't basically  
>> trying to
>> show off how much they know about something of no real importance  
>> to anyone
>> in the universe except the fifty-three subscribers to buddha-l?
>>
>> -- 
>> Richard P. Hayes
>> Department of Philosophy
>> University of New Mexico
>> http://www.unm.edu/~rhayes
> ===========
> Goodness---------it's down to only 53? from the former thousands?
> _

Richard wasn't counting our enthusiastic spam-mail subscribers.

Jim Peavler
jmp at peavler.org





More information about the buddha-l mailing list