databases (was: Re: [Buddha-l] Tibetan for...?)
jkirk
jkirk at spro.net
Sat Jan 6 12:15:46 MST 2007
"fleck"?
Some pedant
As you pointed out there ARE exceptions to the rules, and I suggest that
database is one of them.
All the other word citations would sound awkward in English if the plural -s
had
to be added to them, as in 'eyesglasses,' since we speak Engrish, not Dutch
or German.
Yes, 'data' has been added to the language as a word, few know of its
origins, but I feel quite comfortable with my explanation of its meaning as
a 'base' containing more than one datum.
JK
=========
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hayes" <rhayes at unm.edu>
To: "Buddhist discussion forum" <buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: databases (was: Re: [Buddha-l] Tibetan for...?)
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 18:23 -0700, jkirk wrote:
>
>> Recently Stephen Hodge suggested that 'datumbase' would be the correct
>> form, not 'database,' which is used in the software industry. However,
>> that
>> would work if there were only one item in the base.
>
> Stephen is correct. Compounds are usually formed by stripping all case
> and number markers from the first member of the compound. (There are
> exceptions, as in aatmanepadam and manasikaara.h.) So we say
> "toothbrush" even though most people use the brush on more than one
> tooth, "keyring" even when more than one key is on the ring,
> "eyeglasses" even when the glasses are used for more than one eye,
> "classroom" even when more than one class is taught in the room,
> "postoffice" even when there is more than one post in the office,
> "buddha-l" even though there are several buddhas in every 'L'. You get
> the idea. "Database" is a hideous barbarism, and everyone who uses the
> word is clearly a semi-literate troglodyte. Or, if you go for letting
> people get away wih linguistic murder, you could say, as Stephen did,
> that "data" has entered the english language as a new word that happens
> to be a mass noun rather than a count noun. Such things do happen. But
> NOT on buddha-l. We are pedants here, and each of us likes to fleck our
> intellectual bicep.
>
>
> --
> Richard Hayes
> Department of Philosophy
> Universiy of New Mexico
>
> _______________________________________________
> buddha-l mailing list
> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/1/2007
> 2:50 PM
>
>
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list