[Buddha-l] "Nature" and eating meat
curt
curt at cola.iges.org
Tue Oct 25 06:28:31 MDT 2005
Joy Vriens wrote:
> curt wrote:
>
>>> Yes humanism, the Human project is a project. We can't judge the
>>> whole project on the basis of somme rotten pears (as the Curt
>>> doctrine would require us to do). ;-)
>>
>
>> I wonder what is motivating you to say such an unpleasant thing?
>
>
> It wasn't meant to be unpleasant, sorry for that, but it was my
> understanding that you
> based your assessment of a religion, not on its self proclaimed
> objectives and methods, but on how (some) influencial Buddhists put
> their religion into practice, and especially politically.
Thank you for your very kind reply to my rather over-sensitive
protestation. You are correct in that I am more insterested in "what do
buddhists do?" rather than "what would buddha do?" It is not that I am
some kind of rank materialist - its just that I tend to agree with
Goethe who said "In the beginning was the Deed."
> I already
> mistrust the Buddhism of Buddhists in high power positions, especially
> in the times when conquering power really meant that: conquering power.
> A very naive view if this were a forum on political science, but on a
> Buddhist forum I have a right to judge (predemocratic) politics
> (guided, misguided or not guided by religious principles) from a
> (intimate) religious point of view.
Yes you certainly do have that right - and I think that your mistrust is
not completely unreasonable. But I do think that Buddhism has had a
positive impact on Asian society - and that this has sometimes been a
top-down phenomenon from "Buddhist rulers".
>
> <.... snip snip snip.....>
>
>> But on the subject of "nature": I know it is something of a truism,
>> but I also think that it may be at least in part true, that
>> Buddhism's attitude toward nature changed as it moved out of India,
>> and especially as it moved North and East.
>
>
> Nature being the physical, the corporal, the "animal" in us?
In Buddhist terms I would take "nature" to be everything that is subject
to change - (which doesn't really leave much else, does it?).
- Curt
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list