[Buddha-l] Re: Buddhist pacifism
Benito Carral
bcarral at kungzhi.org
Tue Oct 18 19:37:06 MDT 2005
On Tuesday, October 18, 2005, Joy Vriens wrote:
> "What is the function of an individual" suggests that
> an individual has a function. It also suggests that
> whatever is their function lies outside that
> individual. I don't have a problem with an individual
> who sets himself a function outside of himself, it
> happens all the time. But I find it more troublesome
> when the function of an individual is imposed from
> outside. "Function" evokes the idea of usefulness and
> I start wondering whether usefulness is a very useful
> idea. Useful regarding to what?
I was thinking in a Buddhist line. Everything is
cause and condition. What I was asking myself was,
"What is the cause of individuality?" (How does it
work?) and "What is individuality a condition for?"
(What is its function).
An individual will always be a social being, given
than individuality is an idea. The individual has
learnt his language, dreams, views... from society. As
the Old Guy said, "Individuality is a delusion."
>> I think of an individual as someone who thinks, "I
>> must pursue my own dreams, feelings, and ideas," and
>> in doing so he remains alone, without taking care of
>> others, unable of offering trust and loyalty, unable
>> of commitment.
> I don't think that will ever happen. Even the Buddha
> couldn't keep his own dreams, feelings, and ideas to
> himself and felt the need to bother others with them.
The Old Gay was everything but an individual.
> The advantage of an individual is that they can feel
> and experience things directly in their bodies and
> minds.
What an individual feels is socially mediated.
> Societies don't feel anything, they are blind.
Are you sure?
> Individuals can say "this hurts", individuals can die
> and are mortal.
Can't societies?
> Thanks to that they know the value of life.
How do individuals know it? What's the value of
life?
> Societies don't and can sacrify as many lifes as they
> want.
Can't individuals?
> Besides, Nirvana is only open to individuals not to
> societies.
Maybe because individuals are the problem.
>> So, for me, it's not a surprise that relationships
>> are falling apart and individuals feeling miserable.
> That is because our society is sick of its own ideas
> and dreams and by pursuing those ideas and dreams,
> individuals and their relationships become sick too.
Our society is sick, of course, of the individuality
disease.
>> I think that if there is something that matters that
>> is others, and that's why I would like to develop a
>> family centered Buddhism.
> I think I see what you mean. What this world lacks is
> a stronger sense of solidarity. It needs to reconnect
> with and listen more to individual needs. The most
> fundamental need of individuals is love. Love is
> something only individuals can feel.
Love is a social thing.
I'm going to quote Hsing Yun here:
Human beings are social animals; we cannot live
apart from community. As Buddhists, we are told
to seek the Dharma among the people, for the
Dharma does not exist in some other world or
faraway place; the Dharma is here among us,
emboided un each and every being. [...] When we
understand that human society is nothing other
than a web of human relationships, we will
understand just how crucial our relationships
are. Each link in the web, or each person in a
community, affects the whole. [...] Once we see
how the repercusions of even one relationship
can impact an entire community, we wil learn to
treasure each in creating relationships that are
healthy and benefical. [...] It is important for
us to remember that we all have a key role to
play in maintaining the health and well-being of
this interlocking web.
We also need to understand that human
relationships, like all phenomena, develop the
truth that, as the _Treatise on the Perfection
of Great Wisdom_ says, "All wordly phenomena
arise out of causes and conditions; all wordly
phenomena cease because causes and conditions."
What this means is that the world is the
culmination of our collective karma and
conditions for being [...] Each one of us is
born into this world because of our own
individual causes and conditions, but the fact
that we all live in this world together means
that we share some common causes and conditions.
How you conduct yourself within relationships
will have immeasurable influence on the lives of
others, and vice versa, for relationships
actually create the conditions of life that we
all share. Because of our collective karma and
conditions, it is impossible for us to think
simply in terms of our own individual happiness
and peace. We may try to exist within a
community under such personal and self-serving
terms, but this inevitably leads to suffering
and impedes the nourishment of affinity. [...]
Social harmony stems from handling relationships
and communal living with skill, effort, and a
spirit of cooperation. We can learn a lot about
keeping peace in social living from the six
points of reverent harmony that the monastic
sangha observes. _Sangha_ is a Sanskrit word
that can be interpreted on many different
levels. In its widest interpretation, it refers
to all thos who have the common purpose of
following the Dharma. The six points of harmony,
or unity, in Buddhist monastic life are:
doctrinal unity in views, economic unity in
communal use of gods, moral unity through
upholding the precepts, mental unity through
shared joy, verbal unity through loving speech
and refraining from criticisms and discord, and
physical unity by living harmoniously in the
same community.
[...]
Harmony and beauty within our lives and within
our communities often fail due to our insistence
on the duality of self and others. The ultimate
solution for generating peace and accord in our
relationships and in our world, therefore, lies
in seeing that we all are one.
(Living Affinity)
Best wishes,
Beni
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list