[Buddha-l] Re: Immoderaate nonmoderation

[Bshmr at aol.com]

>Jim Peavler <_jpeavler at mindspring.com_ (mailto:jpeavler at mindspring.com) >: 
... , and  I cannot remember how many times the "moderators" have been attacked 
for their  biases, their prejudices, their aggressiveness, their hautiness, 
their cold  unfeeling cruelty, their lack of cooth and kindness, and on and  on.
>
 
Well, self-selecting moderators with those traits will lead to those  
complaints about those sorts of persons. Plus, I haven't seen any moderating  
activities that I categorize as biased, aggressive, hauty, cruel, un-couth, etc.  Of 
course 99.99% of the censorship is done in secret (probably by monotheistic,  
autocratic, imperialistic, capitalistic loyalists under contract to the USAn 
DHS  *VBG*). 
 
The dominant themes have changed as several have opened up to let other  
aspects live (arise) or to let go of notions of a mechanized permanent  
self-object. 
 
I appreciate the openly expressive personal portion which has been added to  
make the buddha-l room more complete, so to speak. This differs from scent of  
hidden 'wants or graspings' wafting about recently. Very much like insight  
meditation, from some perspectives.
 

Richard Basham
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/private/buddha-l/attachments/20051012/2b2bb92b/attachment.html