[Buddha-l] Gender on Buddha-l

[jkirk]

Dear Jim,
Having had my cup of coffee, I geared up to read the mail after I launched 
my manifesto, and when I saw your name on the message list went first to 
your post. Thanks for your moral support. I have really enjoyed our personal 
exchanges over the years as well as your posts to the list, which have been 
edifying as well as welcomly (not sure if that's a word, Prof!) witty on 
occasion. Well, you are a scholar after all, of English Literature, and 
sometimes that too has helpfully surfaced on the list.
All best, Joanna

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Peavler" <jpeavler at mindspring.com>
To: "Buddhist discussion forum" <buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 7:06 AM
Subject: [Buddha-l] Gender on Buddha-l


>
> On Oct 8, 2005, at 6:07 PM, jkirk wrote:
>
>> Speaking of "open space and seeing," the time has come for me to point 
>> out what I alluded to very indirectly before--that comments on this list 
>> are so spatially oriented toward, and closed, by the males on it that 
>> useful and relevant comments by a female, me in this case, continually 
>> are unresponded to and/or ignored.
>
> I have noticed the same thing about your posts, many of which I would have 
> liked to see followed up. Unfortunately, I am NOT a scholar, so I am not 
> competent to respond to most of your posts. I agree that the female 
> point-of-view is nearly completely absent on buddha-l.
>
>
> On the other hand I feel we have developed a very valuable (to me anyway) 
> personal email relationship over the years, which is about all I have to 
> contribute.
>
> _______________________________________________
> buddha-l mailing list
> buddha-l at mailman.swcp.com
> http://mailman.swcp.com/mailman/listinfo/buddha-l