[Buddha-l] Re: Attan.com

[Macleod, Nik]

>Sent: 16 November 2005 19:06 
>To: buddha-l
>Subject: Re: Attan.com
	
Brad Clough wrote:	
	 
>Although I am not, in the end, persuaded by his arguments, 
>perhaps the most plausible scholarly arguments for "Self" 
>not being denied in early Buddhism are found in:
>Perez-Ramon, Joacquin. Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism. 
>The Hague: Mouton, 1980.
	 
I'm not so sure about the plausiblity of this work. If it is 
to be read at all, I would suggest also consulting the extended
critical review by Steven Collins:

Title: Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism (Review article)
Author: Collins, Steven
Journal Section(s): Review articles
Journal: Numen 
Issue: 29:2 (1982:Dec.) p.250 
Number of Pages: 22

Best regards
Nik Macleod