[Buddha-l] liturgical languages
Mike Austin
mike at lamrim.org.uk
Wed May 4 06:51:42 MDT 2005
In message <4272088A.6060908 at mweb.co.za>, Michel Clasquin
<clasqm at mweb.co.za> writes
>That would leave us with exactly one historical figure (for argument's
>sake, Richard, for argument's sake!) and his writings were all taken
>down by others and transmitted down long lists of possibly
>unenlightened memorisers, transcribers and editors.
In a chain of Chinese whispers, the earlier whispers are probably nearer
to the original spoken words.
--
Metta
Mike Austin
More information about the buddha-l
mailing list