[Buddha-l] life force vis a vis Xianity & Hinduism

[Richard Hayes]

On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 09:55 -0400, Stanley J. Ziobro II wrote:

> But this seems beside the point
> inasmuch as the argument for an Intelligent Designer would likely claim
> that it is not the Designer that is being measured, hence It cannot be
> proved or disproved on the basis of the measureability of emperical things or
> data. 

You have just articulated why intelligent design cannot be regarded as a
scientific hypothesis and therefore has no place in a science classroom.
The very fact that people who like this dogma spell the words with
capital letters--Intelligent Design--shows it is just another way of
trying to smuggle God into science.

Now relate this to Buddhism in some way or drop it. This discussion has
no place here.

-- 
Richard Hayes

-- 
Richard Hayes